The most important differences between the cone head skulls and ours

Above Left: normal human skull with three plates
Down on the R.: Cone head skull with only two cranial platesBesides the "Cone head" have two small holes that doesn't exist in the human skull (shown enlarged top right)

Specimen "cone head"
The jaws are larger and heavier, with different shape and also are different the muscle inserction protrusions. The thickness of the cranial wall is at least double than the current human skull, which makes them about 60% heavier; also they have at least 25% greater cranial capacity. 

The most important differences are these: this skulls have an only parietal bone and its DNA is not human 
This means that there was an ancient human race that did not match with any of today that vanished or that  we were visited by beings that came from the space 

Paracas skull trepanning; you can clearly see the cranial wall thickness

The solid line indicates the "cone head" shape and the dashed line the artificially elongated head; the last is more pointed and has concave areas (curved inward) while the first is convex (outwardly curved) 

A parietal bone only; Will you let to be deceived by those who always skipped this detail and others?  Will you let that someone limit your mind to be trapped into the dogma? the "scientists" provide their service to the elite, that is paying, but they do a disservice to the true knowledge that deserves all mankind if they are to evolve toward higher levels of consciousness

An only parietal bone; there is no current human race with this feature and seen from behind

Comparison

Comparison between a normal skull and one of Paracas

Would affect the cranial stringing or splinting to the eye sockets? The safe answer is "no". Well, the skulls of Paracas of one parietal bone and many of the elongated from around the world have orbits significantly bigger than ours

with cavities greater than ours
 The existence of human races with skulls with much thicker walls has been known for thousands of years and were known as thick skulls; two thousand years ago Herodotus already talked about it to expose that the walls of the skulls of the Persians were much thicker than those of the Egyptians and was a feature for differentiation

Wall thickness of type Paracas skull and normal wall thickness

What do you think it is the cause of never noticing the representatives of "science" for the masses the walls of these skulls are at least twice the thickness of the walls of ours? Do you think it is casual never mentioning it? Will you keep believing the lackeys of those who always tried to maintain us without knowledge and slaves who do not realize of their condition despite the increasingly harsh conditions they impose to our existence?

Elongated skulls and Homo Capensis Karen Hudes, a former adviser of the World Bank, says that a non-human race that she calls Homo Capensis is controlling all globally; she states that this race is present on Earth since before the Ice Age; according to Karen, they created the Monetary System to dominate the masses, come from a long lineage and they are who dominate in the shadows. 

The skull of Homo Capensis matches with the Paracas skull

This would be the appearance of Homo capensis
Brien Foerster (researcher) talks us about this differences

Red, fine hair; the red hair did not exist among Native American people; most of this skulls are of red hair

The size of the eye orbit is greater than normal also.
Brien Foerster explaining that these skulls have only a parietal bone and many more details, such as normal nerve insertion holes in us and in these skulls. 

To see this man explaining watch this video.

Elongated skull and Puma Punku stones in which can be seen the perfection of the cuts

In any of the places where this skulls can be found also we can find stones worked with an advanced technology

Lastly I include a link so you can see what happens to those who want to be authentic scientists; clearly it is explained what happens when the evidence contradicts the rules, the dogmas; it is explained here how the career of the geologist Virginia Steen McIntyre was ruined because she uncovered that there were people in America that worked artifacts 250000 years ago, in spite of having  stablished the science that the men arrived to América 12000 years ago

​FROM MANY YEARS AGO SCIENTISTS KNOW THAT THE SKULLS ALREADY ARE ELONGATED IN THE FETUSES, as two scientists in 1851 wrote a book with their observations:

Rivero and Tschudi in Peruvian Antiquities (1851 Spanish, English 1853) argue that the protagonists of the hypothesis of artificial cranial deformation are wrong*  because only had considered the skulls of adults. In other words, the hypothesis does not account for the skulls of babies and, most importantly, the fetuses had a similar form of elongated skull.  The very formation of the head occurs in unborn children; and this truth we have had convincing evidence to the sight of a fetus, enclosed in the womb of a mummy of a pregnant woman, found in a cave in Huichay, two leagues from Tarma, and is currently in our collection.
*really they are not wrong, but they lie for the interests of their bosses, because what they want is to keep deceived the common people